Ágoston Kecskés
992868991
January 17, 2012
Blog Entry #11: Grand rounds
Since the beginning of this selective in medical
education, I have frequently reflected on my learning experiences in medical
school. It has helped me realize what has worked for me and perhaps why. More
than anything, however, this selective has given me a framework within which to
think about my medical education experiences. I've given some thought to one
particular application of medical education: grand rounds.[1]
Ensconced in the pomp of tradition, grand rounds represent an opportunity for
physicians in a broadly defined group to assemble and learn something together.
But what is the value of grand rounds? Earning credits towards continuing
education seems to be a key part of this exercise, but is there more? In
particular, what is the value of grand rounds for lower levels of trainees? I
have been attending grand rounds for three years now, and I still lose my
bearings approximately 15 minutes into the presentation. Sadly, grand rounds
presentations typically violate many of the "rules" of good
presentations. For licensed physicians and certainly for more senior attending
physicians, the value of grand rounds seems to be high. Grand rounds are often
the only time that members of some specialties have an opportunity to interact
with and learn from each other. There is a disturbing tendency of presenting
very esoteric cases at grand rounds, the value of which is highly suspect. The
most important parts of these presentations to the audience (e.g. when to
suspect a particular disease or condition, when to refer a patient, how to
order a test) are often lost in the myriad details or glossed over
superficially. The value of conciseness in these cases also cannot be
overemphasized. Senior physicians regularly instruct (and in some cases berate)
their clerks to try to consolidate information, only to turn around and provide
excruciatingly detailed accounts of esoteric diseases. It is as if the audience
members are so proficient at managing every disease they see in clinic that
they are bored and can only learn from esoteric cases.
[1] R. M. Lewkonia and F. R. Murray, “Grand
rounds: a paradox in medical education,” Canadian
Medical Association Journal, http://www.cmaj.ca/content/152/3/371;
accessed 16 January 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment