For medical
students, some of the benefits of supplementing our learning with MKSAP cases potentially
includes rapid exposure to a variety of clinical scenarios, being guided
through clinical reasoning, receiving immediate assessment and feedback on our
decisions, and being connected with reputable references. I especially
appreciate how questions are associated with an individual educational
objectives so that we can see the relevance of each, otherwise disjointed,
question and put them into context. I also like how the question discussions promote
stepping back from the facts of the case so to cast a broader differential. For
example, a stem like a “20-year-old man from Cambodia
presenting with mild fever and neurological signs” in the Infectious Disease section may make us rightly suspicious
of an infectious cause, but we should not forget about other important
differentials like structural brain lesions and coagulation disorders.
There are
certainly limitations to this format of learning. For one, these brief cases
cannot fully mimic real clinical scenarios; rather, all the pertinent
information is a little too nicely summarized. There is also, in these types of
self-study cases, no opportunity for asking questions and clarification of responses. Finally,
there is an odd lack of connection back to the syllabus for many of the
questions, which may otherwise be useful.
Overall,
MKSAP, with its myriad of cases, seems to be a good supplemental tool for
learning. I hope to make more use of it in my studies in the future.
Winter DFJ. Review of MKSAP
14—Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Program. Proceedings (Baylor University
Medical Center )
2007;20(3):319-320.
-Jenny
No comments:
Post a Comment