Today I saw my first
ambulatory clinic patient in over a year. Coming into the experience, I felt
surprisingly nervous. I realized I had forgotten how to approach a patient who
was not acutely sick and lying in a hospital bed. I suppose it might have
something to do with the fact that all my electives over the last few months
were done on inpatient units where patients upon initial consultation were
rarely able to walk comfortably down the hall or offer a complete and accurate
history. In that kind of setting, we often
relied on the physical exam and the lab numbers (though primarily the latter)
to make the diagnosis and monitor clinical improvement. Here in the ambulatory
setting, newly referred patients may come without bloodwork results, positive
physical exam findings or even previous clinical notes. They have legitimate
health concerns but appear well externally –or as some individuals call it, the
“healthy sick” patient.
The focus in
ambulatory medicine returns to the history-taking, the “art” that complements
the science. We were first introduced to this in our preclerkship ASCM
curriculum. The practice relies on producing a broad yet specifically-targeted
set of questions that, ideally, is able to identify the diagnosis. Back then,
we took pride in our ability to take an extremely comprehensive history,
complete with our patients’ social details. However, as we began our clinical
duties in the hospital, the comprehensiveness of our histories suffered in
favour of shifting to the more “reliable” lab tests and imaging. We didn’t need
to take a history to know a patient was sick; his/her appearance and numbers
told us so. It’s so easy to forget that patients exist outside of the hospital
setting when you’ve worked there for such a long time, that when we finally switched
to the few ambulatory half-days we have, it suddenly becomes difficult to
imagine the patient in front of us having a complex medical concern unless they
look acutely unwell. Perhaps that switch was what I unexpectedly experienced
today –a transition from the analytical and reactive mindset of the ward to the
narrative and investigative approach in an office.
It’s important to not
get fooled by the “healthy sick” patient. What our clinical experience has taught
us over and over again is to never underestimate the utility of history-taking.
This is often emphasized more in certain specialties, for example, family
medicine where care is predominantly clinic-centred and the accessibility to immediate
investigatory techniques is certainly lacking compared to a hospital ward. So
for those of us entering specialties that are predominantly hospital-based, the
chance to work in an ambulatory clinic is a unique opportunity to practice and
develop our own art to medicine. This is particularly relevant in internal
medicine where the diagnosis of so many rare and complex illnesses lie within
the subtleties of which questions are asked by the physician.
- JJ
No comments:
Post a Comment