Tuesday, February 13, 2018

TB or not TB? A Multidisciplinary Approach

Today was one of my two half-days in the tuberculosis (TB) clinic.  In clinic today, the team was comprised of a physician (today an Infectious Diseases specialist, other times a Respirologist), a nurse practitioner, a nurse from Public Health, a respiratory therapist who joined us for sputum inductions, and myself.  There is a social worker who is a member of the team here as well.   The TB clinic started in the year 2000 and they focus on diagnosing and managing both active TB disease and latent TB infection. 

One of the new patients I saw was referred because of an abnormal chest X-ray finding on immigration into Canada from another country.  Upon completion of the interview, it appeared that the patient had been completely asymptomatic and otherwise healthy.  What do we do in these cases?  We contacted the respiratory therapist and in between her other tasks, she came to clinic to help us obtain an induced sputum so that we could test for acid-fast bacilli (AFB).  If negative, the plan in this case would be to follow-up with sputum cultures every 6 months for 2 years.  If positive, this would warrant treatment.  Outside of clinic hours, the nurse practitioners also serve as a contact point for these patients to notify them of abnormal results and help to coordinate their follow-up.  The Public Health nurse pointed out to me that as a part of her work with Public Health, she often accompanies her patients to their TB appointments.  Many of the patients that she works with may live in marginalized areas or are on social assistance and she encourages them to follow-up and ensures that they feel supported.  It was fascinating to learn about the scope of my colleagues’ roles in management of this complex disease.

A study from the University of California, San Francisco demonstrated that designing an Interprofessional Patient Aligned Care Team (iPACT) to provide interprofessional education (IPE) for internal medicine residents had positive feedback from residents and interns.  It was found that this collaboration created a mutual understanding of the roles of the team members and was better for patient care and safety. (Lo et al., 2017)

In a pilot curriculum study between the medical school and pharmacy school at Marshall University, third year students attended between two to four sessions during their rotations focusing on IPE topics.  Students’ perception towards IPE had a statistically significant improvement from this.  (Gilkerson et al., 2017) These early experiences in such settings have an impact on medical students’ appreciation of IPE teams.  From my time in the outpatient TB clinic, this multidisciplinary environment facilitated excellent patient care and was an enriching learning experience.  I’ll be back in TB clinic on Thursday!

Bonne nuit,
SH

Resources:


Lo, D. et al. (2017). Changing Spaces and Learning Environments to Improve Inpatient Interprofessional Education for Internal Medicine Residents. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00771.1


Gilkerson, C. L. et al. (2017). The Development of a Novel Interprofessional Education Curriculum for third year medical students and pharmacy students. Marshall Journal of Medicine, 3(1): 80 – 89. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18590/mjm.2017.vol3.iss1.13

No comments:

Post a Comment