This past Thursday I
spent the day in the Dermatology Clinic.
It was a special day for rounds that occurs once a month, in which dermatologists
from the hospital bring outpatients that they have been following to be reviewed
by the whole team. The cases were
undifferentiated and challenging and no formal diagnosis had been made
yet. As a group of medical students,
residents, and attending physicians, we moved from one room to the next to see
all of the patients. In each room, we
huddled around the patient, listened to the treating physician’s summary of the
case and members of the Dermatology team asked any other relevant questions on
history and examined the patient.
After seeing all of
the patients, we sat around a table over lunch and discussed each case in
detail, creating a differential diagnosis and an appropriate management plan
for each. The purpose was to pool
everyone together and hear the input and opinions of several
dermatologists. At the end, a few of the
final diagnoses were still somewhat uncertain but the goal of the discussion was
to ensure that any worrisome and/or common diagnoses were being considered and
that the possible avenues for therapeutic intervention had been trialled.
It was a unique
learning opportunity for me to hear the thought processes of the team as they made
decisions. One of the cases was
challenging given that most of the patient’s symptoms had resolved and it was
difficult to make an assessment. The
patient had alopecia as per a few scalp biopsies, however the hair
loss pattern did not neatly fit into one of our known alopecia diagnoses. The discussion
was centred around how to prevent this from happening again given the
uncertainty of the cause. Other patients
had nail changes: one case was non-uniform nail hyperpigmentation NYD which was
a nuisance for the patient, but there were no concerning features on examination
and not likely to be any treatments for this.
Medicine is an art and making decisions with a team can often aid in
determining the extent of a work-up, solidifying a diagnosis, knowing when to refer,
and knowing when to treat.
Bedside rounding is
particularly useful in a field like this where much of the learning and
examination is done visually. It creates
an environment to learn from each other’s experiences and improve outcomes through combined decision-making and team consensus. (Gonzalo et al., 2013) It has been shown
that on internal medicine wards, patients receiving bedside rounds prefer this
method. (Gonzalo et al., 2010) During
our Dermatology team rounds, one of the patients had nail findings similar to
onychogryphosis but with some differing features. She was encouraged that we were all at the
bedside trying to help figure out why this had happened. Team rounding at the bedside not only is an
important educational tool as a trainee, but it also reinforces the importance
of patient-centred care in medicine.
Stay tuned for more,
SH
Resources:
Gonzalo, J. D. et al.
(2013). The Value of Bedside Rounds: A Multicenter Qualitative Study. Teaching and Learning in Medicine,
25(4): 326 – 333. doi:
10.1080/10401334.2013.830514.
Gonzalo, J. D. et al.
(2010). The Return of Bedside Rounds: An Educational Intervention. J Gen
Intern Med, 25(8): 792 – 798. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1344-7
No comments:
Post a Comment